Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Más filtros










Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Nutrients ; 14(1)2022 Jan 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35011104

RESUMEN

A labelling assessment study of Greek prepacked "quality label" cheeses was conducted with a view to provide an overview of the whole category. In total, 158 prepacked products belonging to 19 "quality label" cheeses were identified in the Greek market. Among them, Feta had the highest share followed by Kasseri, Graviera Kritis, Kefalograviera and Ladotyri Mitilinis with 81, 16, 15, 11 and 9 products found in the market, respectively. For the rest of the 14 cheeses, the share was limited, ranging from 1 to 4. All labelling indications, nutritional information, claims and other labelling data were recorded and analysed in relation to their compliance against European food law requirements. The results of the analysis showed that for only 6 of the 19 cheeses, all products fully complied with EU labelling legislation. Among the 14 mandatory labelling requirements, the lowest overall compliance was observed for allergens declaration (65%). The analysis of the nutritional data showed a remarkable variability between cheeses and products. Differences in the nutritional characteristics were more pronounced among soft, semi-hard, hard and whey cheese. The above data were entered into an archival database. Application of global harmonisation and standardisation guidelines and tools lead to the initialisation of a branded food composition database (BFCD), conceptualising a specialised database for "quality label" foods.


Asunto(s)
Queso/estadística & datos numéricos , Bases de Datos Factuales , Etiquetado de Alimentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Adhesión a Directriz/estadística & datos numéricos , Legislación Alimentaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Etiquetado de Alimentos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Grecia , Humanos , Valor Nutritivo
2.
JAMA Netw Open ; 4(6): e2113527, 2021 06 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34129022

RESUMEN

Importance: The relationship between a sweetened beverage tax and changes in the prices and purchases of beverages and high-sugar food is understudied in the long term and in small independent food retail stores where sugar-sweetened beverages are among the most commonly purchased items. Objective: To examine whether a 1.5 cent-per-fluid-ounce excise tax on sugar- and artificially sweetened beverages Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, was associated with sustained changes in beverage prices and purchases, as well as calories purchased from beverages and high-sugar foods, over 2 years at small independent stores. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study used a difference-in-differences approach to compare changes in beverage prices and purchases of beverages and high-sugar foods (candy, sweet snacks) at independent stores in Philadelphia and Baltimore, Maryland (a nontaxed control) before and 2 years after tax implementation, which occurred on January 1, 2017. Price comparisons were also made to independent stores in Philadelphia's neighboring counties. Main Outcomes and Measures: Changes in mean price (measured in cents per fluid ounce) of taxed and nontaxed beverages, mean fluid ounces purchased of taxed and nontaxed beverages, and mean total calories purchased from beverages and high-sugar foods. Results: Compared with Baltimore independent stores, taxed beverage prices in Philadelphia increased 2.06 cents per fluid ounce (95% CI, 1.75 to 2.38 cents per fluid ounce; P < .001), with 137% of the tax passed through to prices 2 years after tax implementation, while nontaxed beverage prices had no statistically significant change. A total of 116 independent stores and 4738 customer purchases (1950 [41.2%] women; 4351 [91.8%] age 18 years or older; 1006 [21.2%] White customers, 3185 [67.2%] Black customers) at independent stores were assessed for price and purchase comparisons. Purchases of taxed beverages declined by 6.1 fl oz (95% CI, -9.9 to -2.4 fl oz; P < .001), corresponding to a 42% decline in Philadelphia compared with Baltimore; there were no significant changes in purchases of nontaxed beverages. Although there was no significant moderation by neighborhood income or customer education level, exploratory stratified analyses revealed that declines in taxed beverage purchases were larger among customers shopping in low-income neighborhoods (-7.1 fl oz; 95% CI, -13.0 to -1.1 fl oz; P = .001) and individuals with lower education levels (-6.9 fl oz; 95% CI, -12.5 to -1.3 fl oz; P = .001). Conclusions and Relevance: This cross-sectional study found that a tax on sweetened beverages was associated with increases in price and decreases in purchasing. Beverage excise taxes may be an effective policy to sustainably decrease purchases of sweetened drinks and calories from sugar in independent stores, with large reductions in lower-income areas and among customers with lower levels of education.


Asunto(s)
Comportamiento del Consumidor/economía , Comportamiento del Consumidor/estadística & datos numéricos , Legislación Alimentaria/economía , Bebidas Azucaradas/economía , Bebidas Azucaradas/legislación & jurisprudencia , Bebidas Azucaradas/estadística & datos numéricos , Impuestos/economía , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Baltimore , Comercio/economía , Comercio/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Legislación Alimentaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Philadelphia , Impuestos/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven
3.
Am J Health Behav ; 42(6): 124-133, 2018 11 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30158007

RESUMEN

Objective In this study, we assessed the impact of state laws governing competitive foods/beverages sold in schools on childhood overweight/obesity among children aged 10-17 years with and without special healthcare needs (SHCN). Methods Individual-level data from 2007-2008, 2011-2012, and 2016 National Survey of Children's Health (N = 108,009) were merged to data on state codified laws regulating competitive foods/beverages sold in schools based on children's residential state and survey year. State random-effect logistic regressions were performed to estimate the odds of childhood overweight/obesity in relation to the presence and strength of competitive food/beverage laws, adjusting for child/family characteristics and state soda sales tax. Results No association between state laws governing competitive foods/beverages sold in schools and childhood overweight/obesity was identified among children with and without SHCN. In addition, no impact of state soda sales tax on childhood overweight/obesity was found among children with SHCN. Conclusions No protective effect of state laws governing competitive foods/beverages sold in schools against obesity risk among children with SHCN was revealed. This study has design and measurement limitations. Future research should replicate findings of this study and assess school district competitive food/beverage policies in relation to adiposity among this highly vulnerable child population.


Asunto(s)
Bebidas Gaseosas/estadística & datos numéricos , Niños con Discapacidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Legislación Alimentaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Obesidad Infantil/epidemiología , Instituciones Académicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Gobierno Estatal , Adolescente , Niño , Femenino , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Masculino
4.
Prev Med ; 74: 117-22, 2015 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25735604

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This study examined bill- and state-level factors associated with enactment of adult obesity prevention legislation in US states. METHODS: A review of bills in the Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity's legislative database identified 487 adult obesity prevention bills, or proposed legislation, introduced between 2010 and 2013. Multilevel models were constructed to examine bill- and state-level characteristics associated with enactment. RESULTS: From 2010 to 2013, 81 (17%) of obesity prevention bills introduced were enacted across 35 states and the District of Columbia. Bills introduced in 2010 were more likely to be enacted than in 2013 (OR=9.49; 95% CI: 2.61-34.5). Bills focused on access to healthy food, physical activity, general and educational programs, as well as modifying rules and procedures (e.g., preemption) had greater odds of enactment relative to food and beverage taxes (OR=8.18; 95% CI: 2.85-23.4 healthy food; OR=17.3; 95% CI: 4.55-65.7 physical activity; OR=15.2; 95% CI: 4.80-47.9 general; OR=13.7; 95% CI: 3.07-61.5 rules). CONCLUSION: The year of bill introduction and overall bill enactment rate were related to adult obesity prevention legislation enactment in states. This study highlights the importance of a bill's topic area for enactment and provides insights for advocates and policymakers trying to address enactment barriers.


Asunto(s)
Legislación Alimentaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Política Nutricional/legislación & jurisprudencia , Obesidad/prevención & control , Educación y Entrenamiento Físico/legislación & jurisprudencia , Adulto , Humanos , Legislación Alimentaria/tendencias , Obesidad/epidemiología , Gobierno Estatal , Impuestos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...